<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Little Man on Campus - Latest Comments in MWC sends proposal to BCS</title><link>http://oncampus.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://oncampus.disqus.com/mwc_sends_proposal_to_bcs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:48:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MWC sends proposal to BCS</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/oncampus/2009/03/04/mwc-sends-proposal-to-bcs/#comment-8050786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right on, 16 teams are needed.  Each conference champ is in.  For bigger conferences like the SEC that has an East and West Divsion breakdown, then send the East and West winners.   This leaves a small handful of at-large bids for the independent teams or for a conference team that just missed out based on BCS (or some similar ranking system).  Ranking 1 through 16 tourney based on BCS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bottom line is this: each Division I team will have a shot of winning it all.  No team will go undefeated and end up on the outside of a playoff system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most people around here don't take college football seriously because there is no playoff.  Meanwhile NCAA hoop is all the rage during March.  Hmmmmm I wonder why?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Big Dog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>